 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
|
THANKS JOHN FOR THE FOLLOWING WRITE-UP:
Investigators: James Palmer / Tricia Grayson / Bess Maxwell / John Combs
Report anomalous information from client, who has requested confidentiality:
Knocking on walls, Bed shaking and mattress vibrating, Shadow by the bed,
Shadows across the bedroom ceiling, and also seen out of the corner of the eye,
Electronic toy turned on, Strange animal seen in rocking chair on the deck,
Rocking chair moving slowly on nights with no wind.
Other data with no means on verification at time of investigation, or 3rd party
claims: Other people shot orb photos on premises, Visitor saw apparitions,
Psychic said various spirits were present on the land.
Equipment/Analysis Utilized: Digital Voice Recorders, Infrared Digital Video
Recording, Still Photography (Digital), EMF Detectors, Motion Detectors, FieldREG
Anomalous Consciousness Detection via statistical inference method.
With the exceptions below, no personal observations were made on premises,
nor scientific data gathered at the time of the investigation. Additional
investigation is recommended.
1. EMF: Emf readings were extremely low and flat in most areas. High readings
were reported in areas generally consistent with these results: kitchen
appliances, central air units, etc. One will notice in the client incident reports, the
number of reports issued in the bedroom area. The clock immediately beside the
client’s pillow/sleeping area, emits extremely large EMF dosage. Two hours of
sleep would result in an amount in excess of the maximum recommended 24
hour exposure threshold. Eight hour exposure, or exceeding the two hour
threshold, could result in hallucinations, seeming real, to the party involved. This
may, or may not, explain the high incidence reports in this area, but is a possibility.
2. FieldREG Consciousness Detection was run in two sessions, the first 1201
trials from 10:09 PM for 20 minutes, 27 seconds. Trial two was initiated after
observing data from trial 1, and was initiated from 10:31 PM, for 20 minutes, 25
seconds and 1200 trials. Trial one data was normal and consistent for
approximately 4 minutes, then showed an immediate climb toward anomalous
level, reaching statistical significance for a brief period of time at about 10:18 PM,
with a z=1.842, and a probability of this being chance only, of P<.04. For the
duration of testing, cumulative scoring remained high, and level, but below
statistical significance. It was this consistency that initiated trial 2. This trial
showed more of the expected deviations of gathered data, but still exhibited data
on the high side, consistently throughout. Statistical significance was achieved
for the presence of anomalous consciousness at about 10:40 PM. The score was
z=1.70, with probability of this being chance only, p<.05. The probability,
combined, for these two trials both being due totally to chance would be p< .002.
The operator was making no efforts to influence data gathering of the quantum
unit. It is therefore possible, for a brief period of time, an anomalous
consciousness was present at and during time of testing.
In conclusion:
1. No hard, scientific data was gathered at the date and time of investigation.
2. Some claim incidences may/may not be explainable by the high EMF field from
the clock radio at the bedside.
3. Consciousness Detection briefly identified statistically probable presence(s),
and this along with a total absence of any hard data results could be indicative of
an intent not to show a presence to investigators. Additional investigation is
recommended and warranted.
Investigators: James Palmer / Tricia Grayson / Bess Maxwell / John Combs
Report anomalous information from client, who has requested confidentiality:
Knocking on walls, Bed shaking and mattress vibrating, Shadow by the bed,
Shadows across the bedroom ceiling, and also seen out of the corner of the eye,
Electronic toy turned on, Strange animal seen in rocking chair on the deck,
Rocking chair moving slowly on nights with no wind.
Other data with no means on verification at time of investigation, or 3rd party
claims: Other people shot orb photos on premises, Visitor saw apparitions,
Psychic said various spirits were present on the land.
Equipment/Analysis Utilized: Digital Voice Recorders, Infrared Digital Video
Recording, Still Photography (Digital), EMF Detectors, Motion Detectors, FieldREG
Anomalous Consciousness Detection via statistical inference method.
With the exceptions below, no personal observations were made on premises,
nor scientific data gathered at the time of the investigation. Additional
investigation is recommended.
1. EMF: Emf readings were extremely low and flat in most areas. High readings
were reported in areas generally consistent with these results: kitchen
appliances, central air units, etc. One will notice in the client incident reports, the
number of reports issued in the bedroom area. The clock immediately beside the
client’s pillow/sleeping area, emits extremely large EMF dosage. Two hours of
sleep would result in an amount in excess of the maximum recommended 24
hour exposure threshold. Eight hour exposure, or exceeding the two hour
threshold, could result in hallucinations, seeming real, to the party involved. This
may, or may not, explain the high incidence reports in this area, but is a possibility.
2. FieldREG Consciousness Detection was run in two sessions, the first 1201
trials from 10:09 PM for 20 minutes, 27 seconds. Trial two was initiated after
observing data from trial 1, and was initiated from 10:31 PM, for 20 minutes, 25
seconds and 1200 trials. Trial one data was normal and consistent for
approximately 4 minutes, then showed an immediate climb toward anomalous
level, reaching statistical significance for a brief period of time at about 10:18 PM,
with a z=1.842, and a probability of this being chance only, of P<.04. For the
duration of testing, cumulative scoring remained high, and level, but below
statistical significance. It was this consistency that initiated trial 2. This trial
showed more of the expected deviations of gathered data, but still exhibited data
on the high side, consistently throughout. Statistical significance was achieved
for the presence of anomalous consciousness at about 10:40 PM. The score was
z=1.70, with probability of this being chance only, p<.05. The probability,
combined, for these two trials both being due totally to chance would be p< .002.
The operator was making no efforts to influence data gathering of the quantum
unit. It is therefore possible, for a brief period of time, an anomalous
consciousness was present at and during time of testing.
In conclusion:
1. No hard, scientific data was gathered at the date and time of investigation.
2. Some claim incidences may/may not be explainable by the high EMF field from
the clock radio at the bedside.
3. Consciousness Detection briefly identified statistically probable presence(s),
and this along with a total absence of any hard data results could be indicative of
an intent not to show a presence to investigators. Additional investigation is
recommended and warranted.
